2006/01/02, 08:34 PM
I know that supersets are not the best thing for strength out there, but the added size you get as a result will help make you stronger somewhat, right?
|
|
|
2006/01/02, 08:50 PM
Added size?
-------------- Strength and Honor!
|
2006/01/02, 09:22 PM
Yes, the added muscle size... due to hypertrophy.
|
2006/01/03, 08:33 PM
Bump.
|
2006/01/04, 09:31 PM
Supersets are good for muscular endurance. And yes you probably would have added size. If your increasing the amount of reps you can do week-by-week in your supersets you’ve obviously got stronger, and you need muscle for strength right.
Correct me if im wrong :)
|
2006/01/04, 09:36 PM
Supersets are a good way to shock the body/muscles groups out of a plateau. IT does not really add mass or size. A true mass building program is not going to use super sets.
|
2006/01/04, 11:26 PM
Anthony Ellis' program uses straight supersets and some people claim making extremely good gains with them. I have been doing them this week, and they are taxing, they seem to really burn the muscle and get the hypertrophy, why wouldn't they build your size?
|
2006/01/05, 01:17 AM
============
Quoting from 7707mutt:
Supersets are a good way to shock the body/muscles groups out of a plateau. IT does not really add mass or size. A true mass building program is not going to use super sets.
=============
That's true i remember when i hit a plateau i couldn't get past those 8 reps! For months then i was just mucking around for a week doing about 30 reps per set of lighter weights and then i picked up the old heavy ones and did 15 reps! Only after a week i was shocked.
|
2006/01/05, 09:09 AM
Cause mass building is done in reps of 4-8 not 10+.
-------------- Less Talk, More Chalk!
The Men and Boys are Separated by one thing: The Squat Cage!
7707mutt@freetrainers.com
|
2006/01/05, 12:54 PM
I reserve supersets for shocks or when contest training.
-------------- Strength and Honor!
|