Group: General Fitness & Exercise

Created: 2011/12/31, Members: 383, Messages: 54581

Various general exercise related discussions. Find out what it takes to reach your fitness goals through daily effective exercise. With so many options we try to find out what works best.

Join group

Squats...How far down??

Diana123
Diana123
Posts: 135
Joined: 2003/02/03
Hungary
2003/06/24, 08:57 AM
I have been doing squats for a few months to get a nice butt, but usually I only feel the back of my thighs and not butt. So the question is, am I doing something wrong or does this just mean that my thigh muscles are weaker? And how far should I go down into the squat inorder to work the butt muscles? (so far I have been going until my thighs are parallel to the floor)
JessicaR
JessicaR
Posts: 467
Joined: 2002/08/12
United States
2003/06/24, 10:05 AM
For me the key to feeling squats in my butt is pushing through the heel on the upward movement, and going as heavy as possible to complete the set. If you're not doing this already, take a few sessions to ease into the heavier weight. A slightly wider stance may help, too.
tarab21
tarab21
Posts: 508
Joined: 2003/03/31
United States
2003/06/24, 10:48 AM
i find that going parallel is actually more difficult than going all the way down. when you go all the way, your legs almost get a little "rest"...it seems to me anyways. as in most excercises, doing a variety is probably the key.
Deby
Deby
Posts: 333
Joined: 2002/08/05
United States
2003/06/24, 11:01 AM
All my lunges and squats must be working because I have on a pair of slacks today that just a few short weeks ago were tight in the legs and hips and today they are LOOSE!!! Believe me the lunges and squats DO work.

--------------
Gramma
JessicaR
JessicaR
Posts: 467
Joined: 2002/08/12
United States
2003/06/24, 11:02 AM
Personally I feel most comfortable going slightly below parallel. Check out this website; has a lot of information about squats; also some form modifications for women based on our wider hips and center of balance. I've found it to be a very helpful site. She advocates a full squat.
JessicaR
JessicaR
Posts: 467
Joined: 2002/08/12
United States
2003/06/24, 11:02 AM
*doh*

http://www.stumptuous.com/weights.html
Deby
Deby
Posts: 333
Joined: 2002/08/05
United States
2003/06/24, 11:36 AM
That is a big website, do you know where to find that information?

--------------
Gramma
Deby
Deby
Posts: 333
Joined: 2002/08/05
United States
2003/06/24, 12:30 PM
I found it thanks.

--------------
Gramma
bb1fit
bb1fit
Posts: 11,105
Joined: 2001/06/30
United States
2003/06/24, 02:02 PM
Most people advocate only going parallel on squats, and this is safe and by far will work the quads to exhaustion. Now, if you really want to hit the glutes and hams, if you go below parallel, you will do this. Think about it, the first part of the movement if coming up from below parallel HAS to invlove the glutes and hams.When you hit parallel, the quads take over the brunt of the work. Is there danger in doing this? Yes, but if you are careful, this is a great way to hit the aforementioned areas.

--------------
As far as genetics go, the skies the limit. You are limited only by your mental perception of it.

Ron
Diana123
Diana123
Posts: 135
Joined: 2003/02/03
Hungary
2003/06/24, 03:49 PM
Wow,lots of great info. Thanks! Friday is butt day so I will try going below parallel and also will try lunges. Are lunges bad though for someone with weak knees?...both my knees are kind of bad(i was told never to run again) so I am a bit afraid of lunges but I guess I will try. I have been doing deadlifts next to the squats, but I don't feel the butt from it. Once again,thanks for the advice!
bb1fit
bb1fit
Posts: 11,105
Joined: 2001/06/30
United States
2003/06/24, 06:34 PM
Diana123, squats can be bad for people with good knees, let alone bad knees. Especially below parallel. Be very careful with these if you are going to do them, if you feel any pain at all, stop immediately.


--------------
As far as genetics go, the skies the limit. You are limited only by your mental perception of it.

Ron