2008/08/22, 11:32 PM
Thanks but does it have a after burn effect like weight training or at the end of it, it is the calories that you burn.
|
|
|
2008/08/22, 07:47 AM
Vary the type and intensity.
--------------
A man of sense is never discouraged by difficulties; he redoubles his industry and his diligence, he perseveres and infallibly prevails at last.
Lord Chesterfield
|
2008/08/21, 11:10 PM
Had a question and was searching for an answer on this site and suddenly came across this post below which was my question but unfortunately nobody has replied to it since a long time.
The good thing is that I saved myself typing a long text.
"I have heard from several sources that there is a "fat-burning" zone that is something like 60-70% of your maximum heart rate. This, to me, means that 500 calories of work at 65% maximum heart rate will be more effective at burning fat than 500 calories of work at 85% of maximum heart rate. But isn't weight loss achieved by a calorie deficit, meaning that workout intensity is irrelevant?
I have been working out at about 85% max heart rate, but I definitely wouldn't mind working at a lower intensity if it is more effective. But, if there is no difference, my thinking is, why bother working out longer at a lower intensity if it makes no difference?
Can anyone help me on this?
|
2008/08/30, 04:06 PM
Hey man, a heart rate of 60-70% will mean more calories are burned from fat during the exercise, however higher heart rates burn more calories in a shorter period of time, and provide a metabolism boost/after burn although fewer calories are burned from fat during exercise.
Hope that helps.
|